Barack Hussein Obama has made many “firsts” for a man who has had no training in business. His list of “firsts” will be shown below with questions that must be answered but the Lame Stream Media has no intentions of asking the real questions nor do they have any one bold enough to write stories that belittle this man we have as an acting President! Why should they hold back commentary and question why Obama does not do as he is supposed to do as the President of the United States?
It can be established that this media has been totally incompetent in their handling of the news. News has been created by a man holding the office of President, which has not been exposed, as it needs to be. This list of “firsts” show where Obama has gone and most are “firsts” that only Karl Marx, Leninn, and other top Socialists and Communists would be proud of.
Let us begin with the number one “first” on the list of many.
Obama is the first president to violate the “War Powers Act” as stated in the Huffington Post, “His offense here was when he, (Unilaterally Executing American Operations in Libya Without Informing Congress In The required Time Period!)”
How can this happen without any or very little action taken by Congress to ensure the proper use of Constitutional guidelines as set up by the very act to prevent the abuse of executive power as Obama had done here?
Now since this relates to the action taken to remove the leader of Libya, Gaddafi, and the recent terrorist attack killing four United States citizens can be directly linked to these actions or lack thereof by President Obama! The attack was in direct response and due to the actions taken by Obama when he first had military action taken against Libya forcing the removal of the man who held the terrorists at bay in his country.
The actions taken by Obama through his abuse of power created a vacuum in that nation which led to the terrorists attack upon the United States Embassy in Libya on the anniversary of September 11, 2001. Now this is Obama’s 9/11 and it was the Obama Administration which deceived the nation by making a blatant cover up to hide the very real fact that this was a terrorists attack!
Obama once again abused his power to send the wrong person out to all talk shows five days after the terrorist attack making very False statements that it was due to a video when in FACT the Obama Administration knew within 48 hours that it was indeed a terrorist attack. The ruler of Libya clearly and profoundly stated that it was a terrorist attack the day of the attack, eleven years to the day the World Trade Center buildings were dropped to the ground by the same type of terrorists.
It has to be noted here that Obama did in fact not go to the intelligence meeting four days before and also the day after the attack, finding it much more beneficial to go to a fund raising event than to find out where the body of the Diplomat was. This is, or should be, clear dereliction of duty as president when our nation was once again under attack by terrorists. Yet, Obama found it much more important to go to Las Vegas to raise funds and talk to a crowd of people than it was to meet with the Intelligence Officers that had assessed the problem in Libya!
This brings forth the question of why Obama did not stay in the White House to find out all he could about the terrorist attack upon our nation killing four U.S. citizens. Was this a huge problem for him, considering the fact that it was like the huge black eye we got on September 11, 2001? Did he throw out the story through the ambassador to the United Nations because the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did not know anything about this because of her not being in the intelligence meeting on September 12, 2012? So many questions that need to be answered just on this one item that no one in the lame stream media has even considered!
One question stands out more than the rest. Why, on September 11, 2012, was the security in Libya not more than it was, especially since the consulate, and those killed knew and asked for more security for the anniversary of the 9/11 attack upon our nation?
Obama is the first President to triple the number of warrantless Wiretaps of U.S. citizens.
Now here we must ask why do this? Only Obama and his minions could answer that question, but once again the lame stream media, at Obama’s beck and call, does not dig deep enough into this very vague and deceptive issue. It seems that this was done to maybe “prevent” terrorist attacks here in the U.S., but did it prevent the “Terrorists” attack on September 11, 2012? That answer is very clear and not at all ambiguous, NO!
The next “first” by Obama is one that becomes very frightening since it employs the very same tactic as was done by the German maniac, Adolph Hitler!
As shown in the Congressional Digest and the records of Congress, Obama signed into law a bill (National Defense Authorization Act – NDAA) that permits government to “Hold anyone suspected of being associated with terrorism indefinitely, without any form of due process. No indictment. No judge or jury. No evidence. No trial. Just an indefinite sentence.”
This “first” has not been questioned by any writer and may be because if they did, they would be picked up under the very law, which in some cases could be used to silence any threat to Obama himself in questioning what he has done. Now this is very problematic, since a Democratic Congress and President enacted this and it is in direct and sharp contrast to the very Constitution they were supposed to uphold.
It is very clear that the Constitution does not allow this type of “police” action to be taken and the Constitution itself states this in the 4th Amendment, the 5th Amendment and the 6th Amendment.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall NOT be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
“No person shall be held to answer for a capitol or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.”
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trail, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witness against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.”
Barack Hussein Obama has announced that he was a Constitutional scholar, yet he signs a bill that cannot be used according to the Constitution as stated by the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments! How could anyone even consider such a law when the Constitution states the opposite? Of course, some will make the statement that this should also apply to those kept in Guantanamo, but those people were caught in acts of war and they are not U.S. citizens so the Constitution does not apply to them or to their trials.
It is because of Obama’s lack of knowledge of the Constitution that he declared this law to be legal. Yet the very Constitution he violated by signing this bill into law has accurately declared it null and void due to the conflict with the above Amendments. This should have been a glaring conflict with what Obama swore to uphold yet he found it to be what he wished, and in that, he did not worry about the very Constitution he took an oath to protect and defend. Obama has stated that:
“I have this thing called the Constitution that gets in the way of what I wish to do.”
Obama is the “first” President to have a sitting Attorney General held in Criminal Contempt of Congress. Tim Brown wrote,
The U. S. House of Representatives, after 18 months of investigation and stonewalling by the Obama Justice Department have voted 255-67 to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in criminal contempt of Congress. Holder becomes the first sitting attorney general to be held in contempt. Looks like the Obama administration has a first for everything.
Eric Holder has maintained the cover up of Operation Fast and Furious. This is an operation that is still being investigated, since Eric Holder and Barack Obama do not wish for the people of the United States to see what they were trying to do. Some have suggested that this operation was done with the idea to ban all guns because of them being used to commit crimes, but that is a speculation that cannot be confirmed due to Eric Holder not releasing records.
Those yet unreleased documents may well prove that was the intent. Regardless, once again Obama has used his power of office to usurp the very branch of government which has the oversight to find out why this was done and why Obama through his administration had allowed such and operation to go on.
They only stopped the operation when Border patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed by the very guns the government allowed to be sold to criminals in Mexico. Although nothing has been found that would link the weapons of “Fast and Furious” to the killing and wounding of Border Patrol Agents on October 3, 2012, it would not be a huge surprise to find out that the weapons used to kill and wound those agents are from the “Fast and Furious” operation.
Obama is also the first President to claim Executive Privilege to shield Attorney General from a Contempt of Congress finding for perjury and withholding evidence from lawful subpoenas.
These are but a portion of “firsts.” There are approximately 42 more that must and have to be looked at since most, if not all of them, are direct indications that Barack Obama has no respect for the Constitution or law. He has allegedly been a scholar in Constitutional law, but this begs another question since his college records are sealed from public view. Yet it is less than 35 days before an election that may well define the freedom of this nation and where the people wish to go, to a Socialistic/Communistic way of life or toward a re-affirmation of the Constitution and the freedom that is to be guaranteed under it. It is up to us to make this choice on November 6 and it will be the most critical vote this nation will ever have.
Editor’s Note: This is the first in a series on Obama’s “firsts.”